Sunday, August 19, 2007

F3J @ ETB

Typical F3J mass launch


ETB hosted the last F3J competition on Sunday the 19th August 2007. A detailed report from Tigger can be seen here. More photos can be found at the BERG blog. Here follows the official audited results:





Many thanks to the ETB team as well as Martie who catered and ended up capturing all the scores for the event. Well done all involved.

Team BERG in action. Evan flying, Piet timing and Derek in background calling.

CD Tent and Marties wonderful supply post.

Tense moment for Lionel while dodging trees.

Michelle fetching the model for relaunch.


Ian flying, Craig calling and young Ryan Nelson learning.

Monday, August 13, 2007

Holland Glide Results



News emerging from Europe is that Philip Kolb has won the Holland Glide event. 2nd was Benedikt Feigl with Karl Hinsch in third. More information is slowly becoming available on the official web site

Wednesday, August 01, 2007

UNCLE SYDNEY’S GOSSIP COLUMN

Dateline: August 2007

Euro Prospects

In two weeks time, Hollandglide will be over. Let us hope that the
Dutch at Deelen know how to work the weather miracle and avoid all rain
and high winds. Then many of the competitors will be making their way
to Trnava for the European Championships and the Trnava Cup. Time to do
some forecasting, hopefully with more success than last time.

The sixth European F3J championships in Trnava, Slovakia has attracted
60 senior pilots and 37 juniors to compete for the second most
prestigious prizes, second only to the world champs. The Trnava Cup
which will be held 17, 18 and 19 August before the main event and is
open to all F3J pilots has attracted 156 entrants so far. That will be
a stern challenge too.

The most remarkable feature in advance for the championships is that 40
out of the 60 senior pilots from 20 countries were at the World Champs
last year in Martin, and 24 from the 37 juniors - 16 countries - were
pilots last year. As much as anything, these FAI contests are an
opportunity for the F3J enthusiasts to renew friendships and compare
latest ideas, models and techniques. F3J contests are mostly tight to
the finish with split seconds and five landing points making all the
difference between top places. It is unlikely to be different this
year.

Over recent years this Gossip column has run through most of the team
members and managers, with odd bits of commentary. This year events
have conspired to leave me with little guidance on form. Models seem
unlikely to have moved on much, according to my information, but we
shall soon see.

So instead of having to plough through lots of names, I shall pick out
one or two highlights, with predictions to guide the betting.

The number of fly-off places will be officially announced by contest
director Milan Blazek at the start and could be 12. These are likely to
come from David Claeys, Belgium; Adrian Lee from UK; Damir Kmoch from
Croatia; Primoz Prhavc from Slovenia. (I omit Primoz Rizner from
Croatia this year because for the last two years I have seen him as the
top place winner and he has let me down. I know it makes him even more
nervous to be favourite!)

Sebastian Feigl and Tobias Lammlein from Germany seem set to make the
last rounds and they will likely be joined by Philip Kolb, flying this
time as reigning European champion and not part of the German team. In
the last Gossip, I reckoned he had already won the F3J Eurotour after
five events. He is certain winner having scored 103 again in Sofia last
month.

Jan Kohout, another ex-champion, will join Jaroslav Tupec from the
Czech Republic in the fly-off. Jaroslav told me last year that he was
too old for international championships - I can give him more than ten
years, but I’ll never fly like he can - and I’m pleased to see he
changed his mind.

The Italians were magnificent last year in Martin and enjoyed noisy
support. This time Massimo Verardi will make the fly-off again. Frank
van Melick from Holland, one of the few to fly his own-design models is
a good fly-off bet. Incidentally, if you want the best restaurant in
Trnava, then follow the Dutch team led by manager Jos Kleuskens because
he will have booked the best table there. Host country Slovakia will
win two fly-off places I bet, Juraj Adamek and Jan Ivancik.

To complete the fly-off list I’ve dithered between the three Turkish
team members. Many neutral supporters in Trnava will want this team to
do well since they will be hosts for the 2008 world championships in
Istanbul. My bet is Murat Esibatir.

Fourteen names for twelve places are my best guesses, and I wish
everyone, named or not, the best of luck, no unfortunate mid-airs and
enjoyable protest-free flying.

Who will be the new champion? Favourite for me is Jan Kohout, for he
will be trying seriously hard this year. Team prize? My hope is
Slovakia as hosts, but equally likely are the Czechs or the Germans,
who will have the youngest senior team on the airfield.


Muddy tales

UK’s awful summer continues, and so far we haven’t had an F3J
competition which has not been hampered by showers, storms and winds.
We live in hope that one day this year we shall enjoy a thermal
competition. We came close at Twywell last weekend with most of the
slots flown out, even the flyoff in the early evening. It did manage to
spatter a few drops of rain during two of the slots, just to be
perverse.

But we flyers cannot moan: in England thousands of houses have been
flooded, 120,000 families have been without running water for more than
a week, 20,000 homes are without electricity. Guesses on the causes
include a southerly shift in the Atlantic jet-stream, global warming of
course, but in fairness most continental Europeans expect the English
summer to be wet.

____________________________


The UK leg of the Eurotour, Interglide took place June 23/24, and
Tobias Lammlein from Markdorf in Germany flew over to take part. Allow
me to share some of the trials and tips.

For those who don’t know Tobi, he was World Junior F3J champion in
Lappenranta in 2002 and he will fly in the senior German team this
summer in the European championships at Trnava in August. He’s a top
pilot. He is in his second year of a mechanical engineering degree in
Switzerland, and the weekend break to get to Interglide was at the end
of term.

Tobi lives 15 minutes away from Friedrichshafen, from where you can fly
with Ryanair to Stansted in 90 minutes. Big snag was that his model box
did not arrive, and by 9.00 pm all hope of flying his three models was
gone. We phoned my friend Andre Borowski at the hospital in Enfield and
borrowed his Sharon Pro for the weekend. Tobi started programming the
model into his Graupner MC24 at 11.00pm, added an extra 30 grams in the
nose, went to bed for a few hours before leaving at 6.30 am next
morning for Marsh Gibbon.

Prospects were gloomy, plenty of rain forecast for the next few days,
but on reaching the field, the rain had stopped leaving lots of mud.
Walk within a metre of the ground sheet on which models were assembled
and the wings were splattered with mud, which dried like cement within
minutes.

Tobi did a handlaunch to test his settings, added another lump of
weight in the nose, flew in the second slot and scored a thousand with
his first towed flight, then went on to take second place in the
fly-off. If ever proof was needed that it’s the pilot that counts, not
the model, this was it.



*

Interglide contest director Graham Wicks (left), organiser Tony Vale
and second place winner Tobi Lammlein collecting his spoils courtesy of
Ace Models and Graupner.


Couple of highlights from his flying: in the second slot Tobi was
circling tight with three other models and came close to a mid-air.
“I’d forgotten it isn’t my model,” as he broke away to look for some
lift in isolation. Then in the flyoff, flying really high, far beyond
my vision as spotter. “I must be careful,” he said, “I’m close to
cloud.” A minute later, “It’s in cloud.” It seemed an age to emerge,
and I would never have found it with my eyes.

The real treat for me was having Tobi as my spotter. I gained tenth
place, far higher than normal, and that was 100% due to his bullying
and guidance. Several times my Supra flew far beyond my normal
boundaries, not only for visibility but also risking safe return. Each
time Tobi was confident that lift would be there - and it was.

How can he know that lift is most probably there? “It’s a hunch,” is
his explanation. How does he know which way to fly after the zoom? He
spends plenty of time following models flying each slot, but in the 30
seconds before his own launch, he claims that he remains unsure of
which way to fly: “Usually that decision is when I’m in the air.”

For many seasons, Tobi’s spotter - Germans call it “coach” - has been
Philip Kolb, especially in FAI championships, and experience of each
flight presumably rubs off. Is that how you learn to read air? As a
young boy his father Stephan Lammlein coached, but for competitions the
father/son relationship became too close for comfort and Stephan
stepped aside.

I remember last year at Martin’s World Championships, Joe Wurts
launched all three US juniors and did the spotting. The pilots were
excellent flyers, and Joe’s guidance was terse: “I don’t like that sky
- better left.” (Or similar) All the time Joe was looking round, 360
degrees. When a move was needed, his direction was ready.

My problems with spotting are first vision, then spending too much time
watching my pilot’s model, then advising too late that someone has got
reachable lift, and then persuading my pilot that he might try for it.
Most spotters I know spend most of the 10 minutes acting as co-pilot,
which is usually a waste




**
Spotter should rarely be co-pilot!


Biggest laugh I had timekeeping a couple of years ago in the
Hollandglide fly-off, was when an ex-world F3J champion flew with a new
spotter; his usual mate also being in the fly-off. Half way through the
first 15 minutes, I overheard: “Look, I don’t mind if you don’t say
anything. I don’t really mind if you keep on talking. But whatever you
do, don’t talk stupid!”

So drink a toast to all spotters, as vital to success as any pilot. The
same goes for the towmen! Wouldn’t it be a good idea of some of our
best spotters spent a little time trying to coach us mere mortals how
to do the job better!
_____________________

Interglide was the first time in my UK experience that the contest
director insisted that we flew some rounds in the rain - admittedly
light but continuous - to ensure that the event would be valid. Anyway
Tobi was due to fly in the next slot and asked if I’d got any “XYZ”
which I could not translate, for his wings.

Turning to Adrian Lee, he borrowed some washing-up liquid from his
caravan, and wiped top and bottom of the wing and tailplane surfaces,
just the gentlest of smears but leaving the wings sticky and slightly
slippery. Tobi wanted the liquid to disperse any water bubbles
collecting on the surface as the model flew, to minimise aerofoil
degradation, presumably the green stuff breaking surface tension. When
the model landed at the end of the slot, there were no bubbles, and the
slot was won.
___________________

To end the saga, Tobi’s three models in the box returned to
Friedrichshafen one and a half weeks later, apparently via Palma de
Mallorca. He has still to see his 50 Euro “sporting luggage” fare
refunded. Ryanair told him several times that they were a low-cost
airline with no electronic label facilities and they could only find
the box when it turned up. Two days after the box returned home,
Ryanair phoned up asking if he had found the box yet!

At Stansted airport I discovered that if you inquire about lost
luggage, you cannot talk face to face with anyone, you can only speak
on one single phone at the far end of arrivals, and that phone is
usually engaged. But if it weren’t for low cost air travel, many of us
wouldn’t get to many Eurotour contests. So take it or leave it!
_____________________

Radio revolution is here

Only in the last two weeks have I flown a model with synthesized
transmitter and receiver, with complete success thankfully. I remain
suspicious. With a box of crystals in my transmitter case worth far
more than the transmitter itself, I feel slightly done by. Also after
three decades of relying upon crystals to make my models work and avoid
interfering with others flying at the same time, crystals take on a
spiritual importance, like candles on an altar, and I’m loathe to
abandon them.

But I am told that synthesized transmitters are now accepted by top
pilots as 100% reliable and convenient in use. I have heard some doubts
about synthesized receivers, vulnerable to mobile phones etc., by
nobody I know has blamed them for a crash or interference. Again the
habit of changing and checking crystals dies hard.

The world of serious model radio-controlling is about the change again
with 2.4 GHz transmission, not the sets which have been selling for the
last year or so with limited range and only recommended for indoor and
park-fly models, but Graupner’s new Intelligent-Frequency-Select (iFS)
system, due to become available in August - any day now.

Both the new transmitter modules - you can continue to use your
existing set - and receivers have a host of features too long to list
here. Extra special to my mind is that Graupner says that up to 120
models can fly at the same time. The receiver and transmitter talk to
each other all the time, and your model and trannie will change
frequency as soon as interference is detected. As pilot, you will not
be aware of any change.

Airborne sensors in the model will send real-time information back to
the transmitter on a four line LCD screen, and you will be able to
track battery voltage, height, air speed, temperatures etc., and the
feedback can be converted into audio signals into your headphone. This
part of the system is still under development, say Graupner, and they
reckon up to 256 sensors in the model can be monitored. What can that
number be useful for?

Most importantly, the transmitter’s output power can be adjusted
between 10mW up to 100mW, because different countries have their own
regulations on what is permissible. The 8 and ten channel receivers
which will be on sale will have a range of 800 metres on the ground and
2 kilometres in the air, if you can see that far. The transmitter
aerial is about 12 cm long, and the receiver has a tiny stub aerial
too.

For the technically inclined, all this sounds pretty impressive. But
for me, I wonder what the reactions will be among the powers that be in
FAI, what changes might be triggered eventually in all the F3 class
competitions.

For the moment it is quite simple. IFS will not be allowed in any F3J
competition because: “Any device for the transmission of information
from the model aircraft to the competitor is prohibited.” But that
can’t last for long.

The whole approach to running competitions to date has been the limit
on the number of pilots who can fly at the same time. Hence we have
man-on-man rules, that is a number of rounds with several groups
(slots) in each round.

The limiting factor in future could be how many gliders can be flown
and landed on targets reasonably safely at the same time? - 20, 30 or
even more. I suspect that we will not see 120 models up at one time,
although that would make the model manufacturers rub their hands in
glee.

With slightly modified rules and staggered launches, you could
certainly have two or three times as many flying in each group on most
contest sites. That could be fairer and more exciting. The many and
various options which iFS opens up, if it proves as successful and
reliable as promised, will certainly lead to some healthy debates in
the not so distant future. Tomas Bartovsky and the folks in Lausanne
are going to be busy!

End of gossip for now!

Monday, July 30, 2007

US F3J Nationals Results

News just in, the fly-off results from the US F3J Nationals are as follows:

1. Joe Wurts
2. Cody Remington
3. Craig Greening
4. Larry Jolly
5. Doug Pike
6. Skip Miller
7. Karl Miller
8. Michael Verzuh
9. Jim Monaco
10. Tom Kiesling (landed out in the corn south of campsite)

Saturday, July 28, 2007

X-pro's


Thanks to Craig and Michelle a number of X-pros and Shadows followed them back from the F3B WC recently held in Switzerland. Here is the first photo of Kurts (white and blue V-tail) and mine (green X-tail).

Thursday, July 26, 2007

F3J @ ETB, 19th August 2007, Call for Entries

Paul and the ETB team have agreed to host the next F3J comp that was
scheduled for the 18th August 2007. There only request is that the
event be moved off their regular club flying day and onto the Sunday.

I will be taking the entries and matrixing the event while the ETB
team take care of field layout and running the event on the day.

So can I please have your entries as teams of 4, with both primary and
secondary frequency as well as your SAMAA numbers and expiry dates.

Mark

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

UNCLE SYDNEY’S GOSSIP COLUMN

Dateline: Early June 2007

Weather rules: not OK!

Don’t talk about the English weather, far too boring and specifically
designed to frustrate soaring. End of May and we Brits haven’t had one
round yet. Meanwhile Contest Eurotour has had five competitions -
Istanbul in Turkey, Forli in Italy, Holic in Slovakia, Ludwigsfelde in
Germany and Osijek in Croatia. And it is already won for 2007 by -
guess who - Philip Kolb!

Still mathematically possible, just about, that someone could beat
Philip because the European league consists of 13 contests and each
pilot’s three best scores count. But Philip has already notched up
308.75 points after dropping his 102 scored in Istanbul. Sebastian
Feigl is in second place 3.58 points behind, with his brother Benedikt
a further three points behind in third place.

For those unfamiliar, how can any pilot score more than 100% in any
contest? If you win top place in a fly-off, then you score three extra
points to add to your total in the preliminary rounds, second place add
two extra points, etc etc. This system will be used here in the UK F3J
league for the first time this year, if and when we actually fly a
contest and fit in a fly-off! The idea is to reward top flyers who do
well in 15 minute slots, competing directly with the best of the bunch.

Returning to Philip, he left it until the last competition in September
to win last year’s Eurotour in Bled, Slovenia. Quite unreasonably, he
has ruined this year’s league with less than half complete. For the
record, Philip has topped the Eurotour six times so far: 1999, 2001,
2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006. “That’s enough,” I hear you say. “Give
somebody else a chance!”

This gossip column is not only about winners. My favourite competitor
in this year’s Eurotour is Esra Koc, daughter of Turkey’s F3J maestro
Mustafa Koc. Father is currently placed fifth in the Eurotour, while
Esra, competing seriously for the first time this year, she has flown
in four contests. Best score so far was 76.16 at Forli, and she is
currently 58th place in the league. Esra is 10 years old!

I first met Esra and her sister, who is four years younger, in Istanbul
when introduced by her mother four years ago. She wasn’t flying then,
but she was already dad’s keenest supporter. Now she tells me she’s
flying the Eva and a Space Pro - “I don’t build my own models, but when
my models break, if it’s not so bad, then I fix them myself. I want to
learn how to build models.”

Esra has already qualified for the Turkey’s junior team and will fly in
the European championships in Trnava this August. She also hopes to
compete next year in the World Championships - in Turkey, of course! I
shall follow her progress closely and I’m taking bets on how long it is
before she starts beating dad.

__________________________


Kiwis attract globe trotters

Moving across the F3J world to both the United States of America and
New Zealand, RC Soaring Digest has carried reports of Joe Wurts winning
February’s Kiwi SoarFest in Matamata, two hours drive from Auckland.
Another F3J star, Carl Strautins from Australia, was also there to hot
up the competition, along with old friend Sven Zaalberg, who flew for
UK in Red Deer 2004 and has since returned home as a captain with Air
New Zealand.

It’s been an ill-kept secret for some years that Joe and his wife Jan
were keen to emigrate to New Zealand, a country they’ve learned to love
since their first visit in 1994. That was the year Joe had a
demonstration tour of the country, invited by keen F3B flyers who
wanted first hand experience of how the experts do it. Joe and Jan
returned several times and in 2004 applied for residents’ visas, a
contorted and testing process which was only completed this year. Joe
retired early from Lockheed and has set up his own engineering
consultancy business They’ve sold their house, and as soon as their new
labrador puppy Lonnie has all his permits and jabs, they’ll move in the
summer.

What I have yet to discover is how long it will take before Joe is
eligible to fly for New Zealand, rumoured to be three years. My spies
tell me he will be invited to manage the Kiwi team in 2008. Confirmed
is that six senior pilots are competing for next year’s national team,
one of whom is Sven, to be decided in October.

Joe Wurts is the only thermal pilot I know with a record of success
which surpasses that of Philip Kolb. (I’m sure that Philip would be
first to go along with that!) America’s loss with Joe’s departure will
be more than compensated for by New Zealand’s gain.

Picture to go in about here

Caption:
Joe Wurts with his Supra and Australian Carl Strautins with fingers
twitching returning to the pits at New Zealand’s 2007 SoarFest held
just outside Auckland.

__________________________

What makes a good F3J model.

Everyone has their favourite model, often the latest “pride and joy”.
We also have our most nostalgic model, that sailplane which would still
win slots if only it still existed. Or the one which you took out late
summers’ evenings and it just refused to come down as the sun set.

The pace of development of F3J models seems to have slowed somewhat,
although none of today’s top frequent winners were around five years
ago. I’m thinking of the Pike Perfect, Xperience Pro or Shadow, Aspire,
Vision, Espada or Supra. The characteristics of top models have changed
too. All of them seem to zoom off the top of the line with more energy
to convert into height. Spans have increased typically by 0.5 metre.

Are they easier to fly? My answer to that is mixed. I’ve had about a
dozen flights with my new Supra in the past week and it really is the
easiest F3J model to fly that I remember. It nestles into thermal turns
and barely needs any correction - as close to flying itself as one
would wish. Whether that translates into better scores, we shall see.

My previous ‘new’ model, now well into its second year, an Espada, is
always full of surprises. I’ve flown it sometimes and been amazed by
its duration abilities. Yet other days, I could have happily given it
away as it came down in kind air twice as fast as anyone else. And I
thought I could trim!

(Picture of me plus Supra about here)

Recent questions from a friend who shall be nameless raised fresh
thoughts in my mind. He’s been flying an Esprit for many years, often
with success, and he’s wondering what to buy and fly next. “Nothing too
slippery,” he says. For instance, he finds a Starlight 3000 he’s tried
tricky. He wants to go back to the SD 7037 aerofoil and is willing to
trade competitiveness for handling comfort.

Time was when you could get a reasonable guide from model magazine
reviews. Nowadays, you get a few pics and words on what’s been fitted
and how long it took to assemble: little more.What really irks me is
when the reviewer has an F3J duration machine and he details his
experiences flying it on a slope. Or you see pics on how he’s linked
his servos and you know you stopped that years ago because they were
too sloppy.

My friend wants help and he’s right that there is little available
guidance. So drop a line to the Soarer or post your comments and
opinions of your latest winner, good and bad, on the new Barcs
web-site.

_________________________

In praise of Elapor

With the scarcity of gossip so far this year, let me sing the praises
of Multiplex and what they are doing with Elapor, their fancy name for
EPP. Many pilots will remember the fun they had with Twinstar a few
years ago. This chunky electric airliner with a 400 motor on each wing
could fly almost anywhere, control-line races without lines, combat
with or without streamers, and fitted with lights you could fly it
after midnight around campsites.

Nearly three years ago Multiplex launched the EasyGlider, 1.8 metre
span, pure glider or 400 electric, advertised as a recruiting tool to
persuade power modellers to take up thermal soaring. I bought one early
on, carried everywhere, and flew it whenever the opportunity cropped
up. It was almost uncrashable and I didn’t hesitate to let anyone
around have a go. No model has given more fun per Euro than that. And
another clubmate is flying it today.

Two months ago, Multiplex went one step better and launched Cularis,
again pure glider or electric, this time with a span of 2.61 metres.
Again it is quite chunky due to the nature of the Elapor, but it looks
semi-scale and it has a four servo wing with crow-braking. It flies
well if a little fast and again is easy fun.

But what sold me and fascinates me is how the Multiplex designers have
coped with the structural problems of achieving a high aspect ratio
wing out of what is simply uncovered plastic foam.

The kit costs £110 from West London Models and is full of innovative
and intricate white nylon components, plus foam jig to assemble the
wing panels. The two-piece wing, each with two mini servos for flap and
aileron, plugs straight into the fuselage and a moulded fitting holds
the wing joiners and the servo leads, plus a catch to lock each wing in
place. The all-moving tailplane has a special fitting which also locks
the two halves in place on each side of the fin. Assembly and
dismantling takes seconds.

If Multiplex continue to develop this material and approach to gliding,
it will not be long before they have high performance gliders at low
cost which will surely help to entice tyro pilots to fly competitively.

Elapor leaves a few queries. For example, I wonder whether or not to
spend a couple of hours using wet and dry paper to sand off the little
bobbles on the moulded surfaces, part of the production process. The
trailing edges of the flying surfaces are 3-4 mm thick rather than the
knife-edge which we’re used to with glass-fibre models. Typically I
spend £30-40 each for wing servos, but Cularis has the cheaper £6-8
mini servos. How much difference does that make? Not a lot apparently.

I’ve no way of accurately measuring glide angles and sinking speeds,
but I do know that the previous EasyGlider had a rate of descent about
twice that of my F3J machines. That simply meant that you had to find
stronger thermals to go up, and it was all the more obvious when you
found one in marginal conditions. Cularis has not flown much so far,
but I guess that its still-air sinking speed is about two-thirds that
of a normal F3J model, 0.5-0.6 metres/second.

The EasyGlider fitted with a 2000 mAh two-cell Lipo had a power run of
30 minutes and it was easy enough to fly for 90 minutes if you chose,
more likely several flights over a long afternoon. With a 1500 mAh
three-cell Lipo in the Cularis, you get about six power runs up to 200
metre height. It thermals fast and well, but watch for tip stalls if
you set the CG back.

Multiplex plus Elapor are more than likely to boost the popularity of
thermal flying and deserve high praise.

End of gossip for now!

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Supra Owners Club





The first meeting of the Supra owners club occurred at the 2007 F3J Nationals in Noordsberg.

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

2007 F3J Team Qualification Ranking


Rank Pilot Berg F3J Nationals Highest Percent
1. Craig Goodrum 5,000 4,724 5,000 100%
2. Chris Adrian 4,950 4,995 4,995 100%
3. Conrad Klintworth (Jnr) 4,953 4,990 4,990 100%
4. Paul (Spoons) Carnell 4,974 4,981 4,981 100%
5. Michelle Goodrum 4,934 4,949 4,949 99%
6. Izak Theron 4,558 4,840 4,840 97%
7. Mark Stockton 4,834 4,791 4,834 97%
8. Hugh Edmonds 4,824 ----- 4,824 96%
9. Rodney Goodrum 4,811 4,258 4,811 96%
10. Dion Liebenberg 4,410 4,787 4,787 96%
11. Ian Lessem 3,923 4,640 4,640 93%
12. Derek Marusich 4,593 ----- 4,593 92%
13. Simon Tladi (Jnr) 4,541 4,271 4,541 91%
14. Joe Coetzer 4,378 ----- 4,378 88%
15. Kurt Stockton (Jnr) 4,375 3,588 4,375 88%
16. Volney Klintworth 4,283 ----- 4,283 86%
17. Brad Conlon ----- 4,267 4,267 85%
18. Paul Boswarva ----- 3,960 3,960 79%
19. Evan Shaw 3,801 ----- 3,801 76%
20. Piet Rheeders 3,526 ----- 3,526 71%
21. Lionel Brink 3,274 3,259 3,274 65%
22. John Coulson ----- 3,206 3,206 64%
23. Ryan Nelson (Jnr) ----- 3,196 3,196 64%
24. Jurgen Hartig 3,118 ----- 3,118 62%
25. Herman Weber ----- 2,756 2,756 55%


The top 10 competing senior pilots are invited to participate in the final round of team selection to be held at Groengoud on Saturday the 15th of September 2007.

Monday, June 25, 2007

2007 South African F3J Nationals Results


Pos Pilot Score Model
1. Chris Adrian 4,995 Pike Superior / OD
2. Conrad Klintworth (J) 4,990 Experience Pro
3. Paul (Spoons) Carnell 4,981 Experience Pro
4. Michelle Goodrum 4,949 F3B Eagle
5. Izak Theron 4,840 Eish!
6. Mark Stockton 4,791 Supra
7. Dion Liebenberg 4,787 Experience Pro
8. Craig Goodrum 4,724 Supra
9. Ian Lessem 4,640 Supra
10. Simon Tladi (J) 4,271 Suprinity
11. Brad Conlon 4,267 Experience Pro
12. Rodney Goodrum 4,258 Eish!
13. Paul Boswarva 3,960 Supra
14. Kurt Stockton (J) 3,588 Escape / Eish!
15. Lionel Brink 3,259 Emonyeni / Eish!
16. John Coulson 3,206 Experience Pro
17. Ryan Nelson 3,196 Mukulu
18. Herman Weber 2,756 Vision


Reports, photos and team qualification standing's to follow soon.

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Jura's Cup 2007

This past weekend the Jura's Cup F3J Euro League event was held in France. The fly-offs where won by Italian junior Filippo Gallizia. Nice to see that that it isn't just in South Africa that the juniors are cleaning up overall. The top 15 where as follows:


1. GALLIZIA, Filippo (jnr) - ITA
2. LAMMLEIN, Tobias - GER
3. PRESTELE, Dominik - GER
4. FEIGL, Sebastian - GER
5. IVANCIK, Jan - SVK
6. HINSCH, Karl - GER
7. ADAMEK, Juraj - SVK
8. SALVIGNI, Marco - ITA
9. FISCHER, Thomas - GER
10. CLAEYS, David - BEL
11. KUNZ, Andreas - GER
12. FOURNIER, Lionel - FRA
13. SYSKA, Jorg - GER
14. BRAUNE, Robert - GER
15. KOLB, Philip - GER


The full results as well as photos can be found on the following sites:

Monday, June 18, 2007

Secret Spy Shot


With less than a week to go before the F3J / Thermal glider National Championships our reporter snapped this spy shot of Lionel Brink trimming his newly acquired glider from the Evan Shaw stable.

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

F3J in the Rockies Results

The results from the US F3J in the Rockies event have just been posted on the Internet. It would seem that current Junior world champion Cody Remington won the event flying a Jarro Muller Espada RL. Second and third spots where taken by Skip Miller and Buzz Averill both flying Pike Perfects.

Round by round details as well as the complete results can be found on the following links:

Prelims

Fly Offs

A discussion about the event can be found on RC Groups

Monday, May 07, 2007

Quasimodo


Rodney, the proud owner of Qusimodo, the new Diablo F3B model from Fischer.

Yes I know this has nothing to do with F3J. However I took the photo and needed to post it somewhere.

Thursday, May 03, 2007

The proud father


Ian, with his new Supra.

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

F3Jamboree 2007 - RETURN OF GOSSIP

RETURN OF GOSSIP
by Uncle Sydney
Dateline: February 2007

Six years ago Uncle Sydney’s gossip column stopped appearing in BMFA’s F3J News. Hopefully not too many yawns will resound when the column resumes in SOARER, the inimitable Barcs newsletter. Some gossip has appeared in the meantime, usually a week or two before any world or european F3J championship with a follow-up afterwards. The aim is to find matters of interest and note to F3J flyers and soaring in general. Please direct complaints or gossip leads to sydney.lenssen (at) ntlworld (dot)com.
_____________

Trnava Eurochamps

This year’s European Champs returns to Slovakia, at Trnava, which is about 50 km north of Bratislava on the E75. Known as a region for wine, thermal springs and learning, Trnava boasts an old-established university and was known as “little Rome.” The flying site, a sport airport, will have as a backdrop the Small Carpathian Mountains.

One day, FAI will explain why model glider championships convene so often in Slovakia. In 2001 we competed in Holic, last year in Martin and now Trnava. I suspect that the Slovaks are keen enough to volunteer, they do it extremely well, get sponsorship and help from local firms, and everyone enjoys good food, plenty of beer or wine, and cheap hotels if you choose to sleep in a bed rather than a tent or caravan. So no complaints. But it would be more mind-broadening to be elsewhere in Europe.

Keen spotters will have noted that Bulletin 1 for the 6th Eurochamps has been issued, inviting national teams to register and giving more details. Teams will start assembling on Thursday August 17. For the first time at a Eurochamps, everyone is invited to fly in the Trnava Cup contest, starting at midday on Friday with flyoffs around midday on the Sunday. Champs proper will run from Monday through to Friday with prizegiving on Saturday 25 August.

News from the various teams will emerge nearer the time, but the UK team has altered slightly. Tony Vale has dropped out to let Austin Guerrier in. Last year’s league flyers will recall that Tony pipped Austin in the last round by a fraction of a point, particularly galling for Austin because he’d been almost certain of a place since round one. Now domestic pressures have let Austin in again, and as highest placing UK pilot in Martin’s world champs, he deserves another go.

No official appointment yet for UK team manager, but it looks likely that Graham Wicks who flies in the Fairlop club, same as Austin, will step into Tony Guerrier’s shoes. As organiser of the UK F3J league, Graham deserves this honour.

What will Adrian Lee be flying? He has a squad of Graphite 2’s, two carbon, (2.07 and 2.13 kg) plus a glass version at 1.88 kg for early morning or evening when lift is slim or non-existent. Last year’s squad still survives, so any damaged model can be replaced immediately. What a lucky man! I remember in the 2001 flyoffs at Holic when Adrian when almost quit the final round because several mid-airs had reduced him down to the last High Five and he needed to fly back at home in the F3J league the following weekend.

Simon Jackson has had a clear-out over Christmas leaving him with one model - his lightweight Shadow which he and Phil assembled overnight at the World champs - from last year. He hopes to be restocked soon with both F3J and F3B models.

Most FAI F3J championships are held in July, and Trnava’s late August dates have upset the Eurotour applecart. Hollandglide has been brought forward to second weekend, 11/12 in August, and UK pilots driving to Slovakia might take the opportunity to go straight from Holland, across Germany and Austria or Czechia to Trnava. UK team pilots will miss the British Nationals which is why an extra two-day rounds has been scheduled for the 2007 BMFA/Barcs league.

_________________

Wing taping

Most of today’s ready moulded F3J models have three piece wings - a centre section and two outer wing panels - connected by carbon fibre joiners. This helps packing for travel, it means that if you suffer the occasional mid-air or a tree leaps out at your model, you can replace a section cheaper than the half wing if you fly two piece wings like Crossfire and Europhia, or one of Jaro Muller’s more recent models such as Espada or Escape. Today’s question is: do you tape the panels together?

Some use insulation tape, sellotape or diamond tape, even masking tape to seal the gap and keep the parts together. Some ensure that the whole joint is sealed top and bottom, some cover the top surface and tuck just a few centimetres onto the underside. Whatever you do, it’s a pain when you’re late and the pilots’ briefing has been called.

I was doing David Hobby a favour last year in Martin when I found him marching out to the flight line with his Pike Perfect, ready to fly, and his wings were not taped. “Thanks, but no thanks,” was his response. “I never tape the panels together. What’s the point, they’re a good fit, couldn’t be better, and they won’t move in flight.”

He’s right, of course. Wing panels and joiners require some force to fit them together, and when the wing is flying, the lift and drag create even more friction between joiners and their boxes. But last time I launched my Pike without tape, I noticed the omission after landing and thanked my lucky stars that nothing had come apart.

Those with a good memory will remember that in the last round of last year’s World Champs fly-off, David had a mid-air with the Italian Massimo Verardi, some 300 metres away from the spot at a height of about 100 metres. His model went into a spin, gained a 20cm gash in the leading edge of the left hand outer panel, and the panel was skewed back from the centre panel where the joiner box had split leaving a 10 gap between panels.

With aplomb, David coaxed the model down safely, slowly enough to gain another 50 seconds or so of flight time even knowing he was entitled to a reflight, and speared the spot for 100 landing points. Nobody was quite certain for a minute or two, but he had done enough to ensure that for the second time in succession, Hobby was World Champion!

What would have resulted if the panels had been taped? My guess is that the damage would have been worse. But I still tape my wing panels!

NB FOR MIKE - It would be nice if possible to fit in the pic I sent you with David Hobby smiling and on one knee looking at his Pike Perfect after landing.
_______________


F3J rule changes

We all talk from time to time about the need to modify F3J’s rules. Although it’s lovely to have two days flying with most people flying out the 10 minute slots, as at last year’s Interglide at Marsh Gibbon, flyers then moan about launch and landing competitions. More sensibly, some flyers yearn for greater emphasis on thermal flying as opposed to mega launching and speared landings.

There’s no harm in talking rules. But changes in the rules cannot come easily these days because the FAI, and in particular CIAM which rules the roost, has procedures and only allows rule revisions at four year intervals unless safety is involved. In all fairness to the “Gods on high” in Lausanne, they actively seek pilots’ views on FAI class rules. At all championships, an evening is devoted to a team managers’ forum where opinions on rules can be exchanged, and surveys are often carried out.

What has surprised me over the last three years is that most pilots and countries are by and large in favour of sticking with today’s rules. One or two individuals have been vociferous in their demands for alterations, but they have not been able to formulate proposals which command support.

One possible exception is on launching. Only Germany today adamantly insists on retaining hand towing and excluding electric winches. Their arguments are simple and compelling: two-man towing requires exertion and teamwork and is attractive to juniors and younger pilots, and proof of the pudding for them is that German F3J comps often attract 20-30 junior entries.

The US team wants winch launching and very few thermal competitions over there have human tows. Even if contests attract more athletic types, the weather is often too hot. I believe that many countries would go along with electric winches, especially if pilots have the choice of hand tows or winches.

A majority of countries now allow winches in their team trials, and as in Britain, F3J hand towing has almost disappeared even for 100S. Interglide, which is part of Contest Eurotour, has to stick with hand towing. What prevents winches? Nobody wants to see the hassle of winch regulations and on-the-spot compliance testing, and nobody has identified an acceptable proposal.



Landing targets

The most horrendous landing of 2006 I recall was Jaroslav Tupec in the last round of the WC qualifying flights, which was critical in that several pilots lost or won their flyoff places in it. With two or three seconds to go, a rival pilot flew at high speed across Jaroslav’s flight path forcing him to rear up sharply and gain height to six metres or so. He then had to dive vertically to nail the landing, which he did. What a clatter! If I had tried, the model would have smashed into pieces - and missed. It says something for the construction of the Pike Perfect that it survived with no discernable damage. Both Jaroslav and his spotter “Samba father” Vostrel grinned from ear to ear. He had his flyoff place.

2002’s horrific lamding was in Lappeenranta, Finland: Arend Borst became world champion when his model survived a high speed landing by skidding some 20 metres across gravelly ground with the nose stopping on the spot. He had been caught half a mile away from his spot with just 25 seconds left in the 15 minute slot due to some misunderstanding. He came back along the flight line ballistically leaving no time for crow braking, hoping that the ground would arrest the model.

Very exciting and obviously - for me - memorable, and maybe when you’re on the edge of winning a world champs, any risk is worthwhile. In reality, would it not be better if F3J rules actively discouraged rather than invited such potentially dangerous behaviour?

Most successful pilots now spear their landings to cut out the risk of skidding across the spot. Even the landing spots are made of thin vinyl rather than hardboard so that the noise will pierce rather than bounce. The stress on models is considerable, but amazingly today most models seem to take it. For spectators, such landing techniques must seem stupid, graceless and unrealistic.

Gossip tells me that some senior pilots with influence have had enough. They are trying to formulate something closer to the American thermal landing target where you are required to land along a line, not too long, and you must not plough the nose or fit a skeg to arrest your speed. What wording for the rules? Send me your draft.

NB. Since this gossip was written, FAI documentation for the March CIAM meeting has been published, and it contains advance notice of the German proposal to divide the last metre of the landing tape into 20 cm intervals. This means that to score 100 you need to land within 20 cm of the landing point rather than within 1 metre. If you land with the nose between 20 and 40 cm away, then you score a mere 99 points, and so on.

This method of scoring is tried and tested: I have flown at Hollandglide a couple of times and at other Eurtours where it’s been used. It does help separate the really successful flyers who regularly hit 14 minutes 55 seconds plus in flyoffs and 100 points every time.

Note that rule changes for each FAI class are only allowed every four years these days unless the change is made for safety reasons. So the new tapes will not be official prior to 2008, assuming the new proposals are adopted. Of course any contest director can make “local rules.”

Also to make an FAI rule change, the proposer is required to give the reasoning, and the Germans are saying that pilots will need to fly more slowly if they are to land with greater precision within 20 cm of the spot. I have checked with my contacts in Holland and Germany and they do confirm that most pilots do come in more slowly. But I have my doubts. Flying faster gives greater control of height and direction, especially if the plane is ballasted.

I understand that UK discussion on the topic agrees with the objective of trying to cut down on speared landings. Pilots are all in favour of the 20cm divisions in the last metre. But they also want to see a landing which leaves the nose speared to be rewarded with a zero. They say the model must come to a rest with the nose clean rather than caked in mud and earth, and the back of the fuselage resting on the ground. Oh for more perfect flying sites!

I am waiting to see the rules written for that. What a can of worms!

End of gossip for now!


Sydney Lenssen.
sydney.lenssen (@) ntlworld.com (attention: new email for Sydney)

Monday, April 16, 2007

Photos from F3J #1

The flight line
Team ETB with new comer Jurgen flying
The event management team
Mark's models
One of the biggest supporters of F3J in South Africa
Jurgen on approach
Mark about to launch Ian's Eish!
Craig with Michelle's Suprinity. This model came to grief in a mid-air shortly after this photo was taken. Michelle was later involved in another mid-air yet came back to take a very credible 5th.
Dion with Izak's Eish!
Izak on approach
Chris with Conrads number 2. His Experience Pro was involved in the mid-air with Michelle's Suprinity.
Team BERG
Paul and partner giving it all they've got.

F3J Team Trials 1 - Results.

The first qualifying event for the South African F3J team to participate in Turkey in 2008 was held at BERG on the 14th April 2007. The results after 6 hard fought rounds where as follow's:


1. Craig Goodrum 5,000 (100 %)
2. Paul Carnall 4,973 ( 99.5)
3. Conrad Klintworth 4,953 ( 99.1) Jnr
4. Chris Adrian 4,950 ( 99.0)
5. Michelle Goodrum 4,933 ( 98.7)
6. Mark Stockton 4,834 ( 96.7)
7. Hugh Edmunds 4,824 ( 96.5)
8. Rodney Goodrum 4,810 ( 96.2)
9. Derek Marusich 4,592 ( 91.9)
10. Izak Theron 4,557 ( 91.2)
-------------------------------------
11. Simon Tladi 4,541 ( 90.8) Jnr
12. Dion Liebenberg 4,409 ( 88.2)
13. Joe Coetzer 4,377 ( 87.6)
14. Kurt Stockton 4,375 ( 87.5) Jnr
15. Volney Klintworth 4,283 ( 85.7)
16. Ian Lessem 3,922 ( 78.5)
17. Evan Shaw 3,801 ( 76.0)
18. Piet Rheeders 3,526 ( 70.5)
19. Lionel Brink 3,273 ( 65.5)
20. Jurgen Hartig 3,118 ( 62.4)


Currently the top ten qualifiers are as above. Also all three juniors flying have met their qualifying criteria.

Special thanks must go to Ilma Stockton for CDing the event as well as checking the scores on Sunday. Jessie and Cian for scoring. Tony and his wife for the excellent lunches as well as Piet and Evan for giving up Friday afternoon to ensure that the field was correctly laid out.

More detailed results can be downloaded below:


Next qualifying event is the gliding Nationals to be held in Natal during June.

See you then.

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Matrix for Team Trials 1


Flight Matrix
2007 Team Trials # 1
======================================================

Round: 1

pos Nr Pilot Name Chan/Freq Hlpr Cntry
======================================================

Slot: 1
1 14 Lessem; Ian 72 (35.120) 1
2 20 Shaw; Evan 73 (35.130) 5
3 13 Hartig; Jurgen 84 (35.240) 6
4 1 Brink; Lionel 74 (35.140) 2
5 8 Coetzer; Joe 41 (53.800) 3
6 17 Nelson; Simon 61 (35.010) 4

Slot: 2
1 4 Stockton; Mark 92 (35.250) 1
2 19 Rheeders; Piet 79 (35.190) 5
3 7 Carnall; Paul 61 (35.010) 6
4 10 Goodrum; Michelle 70 (35.100) 2
5 6 Adrian; Chris 69 (35.090) 3
6 - -

Slot: 3
1 18 Nelson; Ryan 90 (35.300) 1
2 9 Edmonds; Hugh 101 (35.410) 5
3 15 Liebenberg; Dion 74 (35.140) 6
4 11 Goodrum; Craig 77 (35.170) 2
5 2 Klintworth; Conrad 68 (35.080) 3
6 - -

Slot: 4
1 5 Stockton; Kurt 60 (35.000) 1
2 16 Marusich; Derek 76 (35.160) 5
3 21 Theron; Izak 62 (35.020) 6
4 12 Goodrum; Rodney 64 (35.040) 2
5 3 Klintworth; Volney 82 (35.220) 3
6 22 Tladi; Simon 77 (35.170) 4

Round: 2

pos Nr Pilot Name Chan/Freq Hlpr Cntry
======================================================

Slot: 1
1 14 Lessem; Ian 72 (35.120) 1
2 20 Shaw; Evan 73 (35.130) 5
3 1 Brink; Lionel 74 (35.140) 2
4 17 Nelson; Simon 61 (35.010) 4
5 13 Hartig; Jurgen 84 (35.240) 6
6 3 Klintworth; Volney 82 (35.220) 3

Slot: 2
1 18 Nelson; Ryan 90 (35.300) 1
2 9 Edmonds; Hugh 101 (35.410) 5
3 11 Goodrum; Craig 77 (35.170) 2
4 - -
5 15 Liebenberg; Dion 74 (35.140) 6
6 2 Klintworth; Conrad 68 (35.080) 3

Slot: 3
1 4 Stockton; Mark 92 (35.250) 1
2 16 Marusich; Derek 76 (35.160) 5
3 12 Goodrum; Rodney 64 (35.040) 2
4 - -
5 7 Carnall; Paul 61 (35.010) 6
6 6 Adrian; Chris 69 (35.090) 3

Slot: 4
1 5 Stockton; Kurt 60 (35.000) 1
2 19 Rheeders; Piet 79 (35.190) 5
3 10 Goodrum; Michelle 70 (35.100) 2
4 22 Tladi; Simon 77 (35.170) 4
5 21 Theron; Izak 62 (35.020) 6
6 8 Coetzer; Joe 41 (53.800) 3

Round: 3

pos Nr Pilot Name Chan/Freq Hlpr Cntry
======================================================

Slot: 1
1 2 Klintworth; Conrad 68 (35.080) 3
2 14 Lessem; Ian 72 (35.120) 1
3 22 Tladi; Simon 77 (35.170) 4
4 9 Edmonds; Hugh 101 (35.410) 5
5 21 Theron; Izak 62 (35.020) 6
6 10 Goodrum; Michelle 70 (35.100) 2

Slot: 2
1 3 Klintworth; Volney 82 (35.220) 3
2 4 Stockton; Mark 92 (35.250) 1
3 - -
4 20 Shaw; Evan 73 (35.130) 5
5 7 Carnall; Paul 61 (35.010) 6
6 12 Goodrum; Rodney 64 (35.040) 2

Slot: 3
1 6 Adrian; Chris 69 (35.090) 3
2 18 Nelson; Ryan 90 (35.300) 1
3 - -
4 16 Marusich; Derek 76 (35.160) 5
5 13 Hartig; Jurgen 84 (35.240) 6
6 1 Brink; Lionel 74 (35.140) 2

Slot: 4
1 8 Coetzer; Joe 41 (53.800) 3
2 5 Stockton; Kurt 60 (35.000) 1
3 17 Nelson; Simon 61 (35.010) 4
4 19 Rheeders; Piet 79 (35.190) 5
5 15 Liebenberg; Dion 74 (35.140) 6
6 11 Goodrum; Craig 77 (35.170) 2

Round: 4

pos Nr Pilot Name Chan/Freq Hlpr Cntry
======================================================

Slot: 1
1 5 Stockton; Kurt 60 (35.000) 1
2 20 Shaw; Evan 73 (35.130) 5
3 7 Carnall; Paul 61 (35.010) 6
4 11 Goodrum; Craig 77 (35.170) 2
5 2 Klintworth; Conrad 68 (35.080) 3
6 - -

Slot: 2
1 4 Stockton; Mark 92 (35.250) 1
2 16 Marusich; Derek 76 (35.160) 5
3 13 Hartig; Jurgen 84 (35.240) 6
4 12 Goodrum; Rodney 64 (35.040) 2
5 6 Adrian; Chris 69 (35.090) 3
6 22 Tladi; Simon 77 (35.170) 4

Slot: 3
1 18 Nelson; Ryan 90 (35.300) 1
2 19 Rheeders; Piet 79 (35.190) 5
3 15 Liebenberg; Dion 74 (35.140) 6
4 10 Goodrum; Michelle 70 (35.100) 2
5 8 Coetzer; Joe 41 (53.800) 3
6 - -

Slot: 4
1 14 Lessem; Ian 72 (35.120) 1
2 9 Edmonds; Hugh 101 (35.410) 5
3 21 Theron; Izak 62 (35.020) 6
4 1 Brink; Lionel 74 (35.140) 2
5 3 Klintworth; Volney 82 (35.220) 3
6 17 Nelson; Simon 61 (35.010) 4

Round: 5

pos Nr Pilot Name Chan/Freq Hlpr Cntry
======================================================

Slot: 1
1 9 Edmonds; Hugh 101 (35.410) 5
2 10 Goodrum; Michelle 70 (35.100) 2
3 6 Adrian; Chris 69 (35.090) 3
4 18 Nelson; Ryan 90 (35.300) 1
5 - -
6 21 Theron; Izak 62 (35.020) 6

Slot: 2
1 16 Marusich; Derek 76 (35.160) 5
2 12 Goodrum; Rodney 64 (35.040) 2
3 8 Coetzer; Joe 41 (53.800) 3
4 5 Stockton; Kurt 60 (35.000) 1
5 22 Tladi; Simon 77 (35.170) 4
6 15 Liebenberg; Dion 74 (35.140) 6

Slot: 3
1 20 Shaw; Evan 73 (35.130) 5
2 11 Goodrum; Craig 77 (35.170) 2
3 3 Klintworth; Volney 82 (35.220) 3
4 14 Lessem; Ian 72 (35.120) 1
5 - -
6 7 Carnall; Paul 61 (35.010) 6

Slot: 4
1 19 Rheeders; Piet 79 (35.190) 5
2 1 Brink; Lionel 74 (35.140) 2
3 2 Klintworth; Conrad 68 (35.080) 3
4 4 Stockton; Mark 92 (35.250) 1
5 17 Nelson; Simon 61 (35.010) 4
6 13 Hartig; Jurgen 84 (35.240) 6

Round: 6

pos Nr Pilot Name Chan/Freq Hlpr Cntry
======================================================

Slot: 1
1 22 Tladi; Simon 77 (35.170) 4
2 7 Carnall; Paul 61 (35.010) 6
3 2 Klintworth; Conrad 68 (35.080) 3
4 18 Nelson; Ryan 90 (35.300) 1
5 1 Brink; Lionel 74 (35.140) 2
6 20 Shaw; Evan 73 (35.130) 5

Slot: 2
1 17 Nelson; Simon 61 (35.010) 4
2 13 Hartig; Jurgen 84 (35.240) 6
3 6 Adrian; Chris 69 (35.090) 3
4 14 Lessem; Ian 72 (35.120) 1
5 11 Goodrum; Craig 77 (35.170) 2
6 16 Marusich; Derek 76 (35.160) 5

Slot: 3
1 - -
2 21 Theron; Izak 62 (35.020) 6
3 8 Coetzer; Joe 41 (53.800) 3
4 5 Stockton; Kurt 60 (35.000) 1
5 10 Goodrum; Michelle 70 (35.100) 2
6 19 Rheeders; Piet 79 (35.190) 5

Slot: 4
1 - -
2 15 Liebenberg; Dion 74 (35.140) 6
3 3 Klintworth; Volney 82 (35.220) 3
4 4 Stockton; Mark 92 (35.250) 1
5 12 Goodrum; Rodney 64 (35.040) 2
6 9 Edmonds; Hugh 101 (35.410) 5